The Goal Subscale Epistemology was also a significant predictor of therapist emphasis on the working alliance along the Goal subscale (e.g. client and therapist agreement on how to achieve the goals), F(2, 1093) = 4.92, p < .007 (R 2 = .009). 065) for the rationalist epistemology t(1093) = 2.16, p < .031, was in the positive direction. 075) for the constructivist epistemology t(1093) = 2.47, p < .014, was also in the positive direction along the Goal subscale. This was again inconsistent with the proposed hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology would have stronger leanings towards the Goal subscale in the therapist emphasis on working alliance compared to therapists with a constructivist epistemology.
The Bond Subscale Lastly, epistemology was also a significant predictor of the therapist emphasis on the working alliance along the Bond subscale (the development of a personal bond between the client and therapist), F(2, 1089) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .035). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = – 0.034) was in the negative direction, but was not significant, t(1089) = –1.15, p < .249. For the constructivist epistemology, the standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.179) was significant t(1089) = 5.99, p < .0001, and in the positive direction along the Bond subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology is less inclined towards therapist emphasis on working alliance on the Bond subscale than the constructivist epistemology.
Practitioners having a constructivist epistemology tended to put much more focus on the personal thread on therapeutic relationship as compared to therapists having good rationalist epistemology
The present day investigation showed that therapist epistemology are a significant predictor of at least some aspects of the functional alliance. The strongest looking for was in reference to the development of an effective individual thread between the buyer and you can specialist (Thread subscale). So it supports the notion in the books you to constructivist therapists lay a heightened focus on building a quality therapeutic matchmaking described as, “greeting, knowledge, believe, and you may caring.
Theory step three-the selection of Specific Therapeutic Treatments
The next and you can final investigation is designed to address the forecast one epistemology would be a predictor away from counselor the means to access particular cures process. Way more especially, the rationalist epistemology tend to report using process of the intellectual behavioural treatment (elizabeth.grams. information giving) more than constructivist epistemologies, and you may therapists that have constructivist epistemologies have a tendency to statement having fun with processes associated with the constructivist cures (elizabeth.grams. mental handling) over practitioners that have rationalist epistemologies). A parallel linear regression study was presented to decide in the event the predictor variable (therapist epistemology) usually dictate therapist studies of your own standards details (medication procedure).
Epistemology was a significant predictor of cognitive behavioral therapy techniques F(2, 993) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .185). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = 0.430) was significant, t(993) = , p < .001 and in the positive direction. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = 0.057) was significant and in the positive direction t(993) = 1.98, p < .05. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology would have stronger leanings of therapist use of cognitive behavioral techniques when conducting therapy than constructivist epistemologies.
Finally, epistemology was a significant https://datingranking.net/local-hookup/bristol/ predictor of constructivist therapy techniques F(2, 1012) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .138). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = – 0.297) was significant t(1012) = –, p < .0001 and in the negative direction. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = 0.195) was significant t(1012) = 6.63, p < .0001, and in the positive direction. This supported the hypothesis that the constructivist epistemology would place a stronger emphasis on therapist use of constructivist techniques when conducting therapy than rationalist epistemologies.
